In general, one can write the logical statement like that:
first premises: (object1) + (relation1) + (object2) {The relation is either verbal, or empirical, or past-concluded}
second premises: (object3) + (relation2) + (object2) {the relation is either verbal, or empirical, or past-concluded}
Conclusion: (object3) + (relation2) + (object1)
In order for a relation to be objective.. it has to be always true wherever you examine it.. or else it would be subjective and can't be examined whether true or not
The problem in concluding is that we get familiar to this process because we use language everyday, from our childhood we learn it as a subconscious process, and start making it intuitively, so we fill in some nasty philosophers' tricks :P
hope this is useful
first premises: (object1) + (relation1) + (object2) {The relation is either verbal, or empirical, or past-concluded}
second premises: (object3) + (relation2) + (object2) {the relation is either verbal, or empirical, or past-concluded}
Conclusion: (object3) + (relation2) + (object1)
In order for a relation to be objective.. it has to be always true wherever you examine it.. or else it would be subjective and can't be examined whether true or not
The problem in concluding is that we get familiar to this process because we use language everyday, from our childhood we learn it as a subconscious process, and start making it intuitively, so we fill in some nasty philosophers' tricks :P
hope this is useful

ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق